Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 82
Menu
Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media is part of t...

NAB VICTIM

NAB VICTIM

In late 2008 we became vi...

Banking In Australia Today

Banking In Australia Today

Visit Banking in Austra...

Donate Please

Donate Please

We need your support. ...

Prev Next

Homeowners Win U.S. High Court Clash on Canceling Mortgages

Homeowners Win U.S. High Court Clash on Canceling Mortgages
The U.S. Supreme Court gave homeowners more ability to cancel their mortgages if lenders don’t provide the required disclosures, in a setback for the banking industry.

The dispute centered on the three-year deadline for borrowers seeking to rescind their mortgages. The justices today said unanimously that borrowers don’t have to file suit within three years and instead can meet the deadline by sending a letter to lenders.

The issue is one that the banking industry says has arisen frequently in recent years with borrowers who are in default on their mortgages and are facing foreclosure.

The Supreme Court ruling is a victory for Larry and Cheryle Jesinoski, who in 2007 refinanced their Eagan, Minnesota, home for $611,000 with Countrywide Home Loans Inc., now part of Bank of America Corp. (BAC)

Exactly three years later, the Jesinoskis sent the lender a written notice that they wanted to rescind the accord, saying they hadn’t received copies of two disclosure forms required under federal law. Bank of America refused to cancel the mortgage, and the Jesinoskis sued.

The ruling doesn’t necessarily mean homeowners will be able to escape paying their mortgages. The Jesinoski case now returns to a lower court, where Bank of America will have a chance to argue that the couple received the required forms. Bank of America says the Jesinoskis signed an acknowledgment that they were provided with the disclosures.

Lending Law

Under the U.S. Truth in Lending Act, borrowers have three days to rescind a mortgage after they receive the disclosures. That right expires after three years, even if the forms are never provided.

In his opinion for the court today, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the lending statute says “in unequivocal terms” that the borrower can rescind the mortgage simply by notifying the lender.

“So long as the borrower notifies within three years after the transaction is consummated, his rescission is timely,” Scalia wrote. “The statute does not also require him to sue within three years.”

The case is Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, 13-684.

To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Patrick Oster at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Laurie Asseo, Mark McQuillan

Author: Greg Stohr
Source: Bloomberg.com

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

back to top

News

Major Topics

Helpful Resources

Socialize

About Us